U2 is sued for allegedly stealing song for ‘Achtung Baby’

MANHATTAN: A British songwriter and guitarist has sued U2, claiming the band stole considered one of his works for a song on its blockbuster 1991 album “Achtung Baby.”

U2 is sued for allegedly
U2 is sued for allegedly

In a grievance filed on Monday night time within the U.S. District Court in Manhattan, Paul Rose sought no less than $five million in damages from U2 lead singer Bono and bandmates The Edge, Adam Clayton and Larry Mullen Jr., in addition to Island Records.

Rose, who stated he has a dozen of his personal albums, stated the Irish band lifted “signature parts” of his copyrighted song “Nae Slappin” for its hit song “The Fly.”

He stated this happened at a time U2, then arguably the arena’s most well liked rock band, used to be in quest of a “stark departure” from its trademark sound.

Rose stated he gave a demo tape of “Nae Slappin” to Island in 1989, the similar yr the label signed U2, and that “The Fly” included its guitar solo and different parts, together with distortion and “industrial-style” percussion.

Rose stated peculiar listeners “would relatively in finding that the songs are considerably equivalent,” and now and then so “strikingly identical” that they may now not consider U2 got here up with “The Fly” by itself.

U2 representatives didn’t in an instant reply on Tuesday to requests for remark. Island’s mum or dad, Universal Music Group, a unit of France’s Vivendi SA, didn’t in an instant reply to a equivalent request.

It used to be now not in an instant transparent why Rose waited greater than 25 years to sue. His attorney didn’t right away reply to requests for remark.

Well-known artists are ceaselessly accused of stealing song concepts from different composers, despite the fact that few instances move to trial.

Last June, Led Zeppelin prevailed at trial over whether or not it lifted the hole guitar passage to “Stairway to Heaven.”

A jury in March 2015 awarded Marvin Gaye’s circle of relatives $7.four million for alleged copyright infringement via Robin Thicke and Pharrell Williams for their hit “Blurred Lines.” Thicke and Williams have appealed the decision.

The case is Rose v Hewson et al, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 17-01471.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *